Originally going by Yung Gleesh, the East Coast rapper has since dropped his prefix and been putting in work over the years. Previous projects such …
Read the original post:
Gleesh Drops Self-Titled Mixtape
Originally going by Yung Gleesh, the East Coast rapper has since dropped his prefix and been putting in work over the years. Previous projects such …
Read the original post:
Gleesh Drops Self-Titled Mixtape
Rap has been a dramatically male-dominated genre, and the hip-hop industry hadn't seen many record-breaking female MCs since Lauryn Hill in the …
Here is the original post:
5 Reasons Why Cardi B Is a Modern Day Feminist
Rap has been a dramatically male-dominated genre, and the hip-hop industry hadn't seen many record-breaking female MCs since Lauryn Hill in the …
View original post here:
5 Reasons Why Cardi B Is a Modern Day Feminist
Miller immediately breaks into singing the lines to his song 34 seconds into the music video. The rap artist removes his shoes at one point in the clip, …
Go here to read the rest:
Mac Miller Shares 'Swimming' Cover Art And Tracklist, Releases 'Self Care' Music Video
Miller immediately breaks into singing the lines to his song 34 seconds into the music video. The rap artist removes his shoes at one point in the clip, …
Read more:
Mac Miller Shares 'Swimming' Cover Art And Tracklist, Releases 'Self Care' Music Video
A poet, songwriter and talented producer, Vector is in the league of artiste running the rap game in Nigeria today. Unlike those, who got into rap by …
View post:
Vector: Popular Venom Of A Rap Viper
A poet, songwriter and talented producer, Vector is in the league of artiste running the rap game in Nigeria today. Unlike those, who got into rap by …
Read more from the original source:
Vector: Popular Venom Of A Rap Viper
WASHINGTON (CNN) — The top Democrats in Congress on Friday called for President Donald Trump to cancel his upcoming summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin after the Justice Department announced indictments against 12 Russian nationals, that accused them of engaging in a “sustained effort” to hack Democrats’ emails and computer networks. “President Trump should cancel his meeting with Vladimir Putin until Russia takes demonstrable and transparent steps to prove that they won’t interfere in future elections. Glad-handing with Vladimir Putin on the heels of these indictments would be an insult to our democracy,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a statement. The top Democrat in the House, Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California, tweeted, “@realDonaldTrump must immediately cancel his meeting with Putin.” Pelosi had said in an earlier statement, “The stakes for the upcoming Trump-Putin meeting could not be higher. President Trump must demand and secure a real, concrete and comprehensive agreement that the Russians will cease their ongoing attacks on our democracy. Failure to stand up to Putin would constitute a profound betrayal of the Constitution and our democracy.” The call to cancel the summit came after a week in which Democrats have expressed widespread concerns about Trump’s ability to sit down and challenge Putin in a one-on-one meeting, which is scheduled for Monday. White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said Friday the summit will not be canceled. In an interview on Capitol Hill, Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said he is concerned that the President’s “ad-hoc” style of going into meetings and “winging it” is not appropriate and that the meeting should be called off with Putin. Warner said he’s concerned the US “President can be taken advantage of” by Putin, and that if a meeting cannot have additional attendees it should be scrapped. “There should be no one-on-one meeting between this President and Mr. Putin,” Warner told reporters Friday. Sen. Tammy Duckworth, an Illinois Democrat, also called for scrapping the meeting. “We must bring to bear the full force of U.S. sanctions against Russia as well as consider their expansion against broader sectors of the Russian economy,” Duckworth said in her statement. “Donald Trump must immediately cancel his planned summit with Vladimir Putin until Russia demonstrates its willingness to come back into the community of nations that respect the rule of law, legal norms and democratic institutions.” The Justice Department announced its indictments in special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election. All 12 defendants are members of the GRU, a Russian federation intelligence agency within the main intelligence directorate of the Russian military, who were acting in “their official capacities.” Rep. Jerry Nadler, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, said Trump should demand the extradition of the Russians indicted on Friday, but he predicted that would not happen. “He should demand that,” said Nadler of New York. “I’m sure he won’t.” Nadler said he didn’t think that Trump should cancel the summit, but he agreed that the President should not be meeting with Putin alone. Sen. Bob Menendez, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, also called for “the Russian spies indicted by the United States for interfering in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.” “Second, the Treasury Department must immediately impose sanctions mandated by Congress on the Russian intelligence officers indicted today,” said Menendez of New Jersey. “And third, the President should demand Putin return Crimea to Ukraine, release individuals from Crimea imprisoned by Russia on political grounds, and fulfill his pledge to remove Iran from Syria.” “It is time for this President to stand up for America. It’s time for him to put on his big boy pants and push back against Russia,” California Rep. John Garamendi said in an interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer on “The Situation Room.” “If we continue to be a little baby in the background as the President thinks we should be, then we’re going to continue to get pushed around and there’s going to be a very serious consequence in Europe, in the United States, in every free election around this world,” said the member of the House Armed Services committee. The-CNN-Wire & © 2018 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved.
View original post here:
Top Democrats Call On Trump To Cancel Face-To-Face With Putin
THAILAND (CBSNewYork) — The young soccer players rescued from a cave in Thailand say they only intended to be inside for an hour. That hour turned into more than two weeks. Now, the father of the youngest boy is sharing his son’s frightening ordeal. “I felt relief, I was so happy,” Tanawut said through a translator. Tanawut told CBS News about the moment he learned his 11-year-old son Titan would be rescued from the cave . The boy was the youngest of the 12 soccer players trapped for more than two weeks . And little Titan emerged, with big stories to tell. He told his father the boys were forced to run deep into the cave they were exploring when fast-moving water started flowing in. He said the boys’ soccer coach, named Ake, tried to swim to find a way out for them, but the water was so fast and so deep, he turned back around. Titan told his father the first three days in the cave were the hardest. The group was hungry and cold. The boys had trouble sleeping, and Titan cried, because he missed his mom and dad. Coach Ake hugged and encouraged him to be strong, Tanawut said. When asked how he felt about what the coach did for his son, Tanawut said, “I am touched. If the kids didn’t have Coach Ake, I don’t know how they could have survived.” Back in London Friday morning, British divers involved in the rescue, said nothing like this has ever been done before. “There was a lot of chaos, but we were so task-oriented and focused that we sort of blanked that out and carried on with the job at hand, step by step,” said diver Rick Stanton. And Tanawut said for that, he is thankful. He said us Titan is doing well. He said the first thing his son asked when he got out of the cave was where was his coach was and how he was doing. Thai health officials say all the kids are in good mental and physical health. FIFA’s president invited the boys to attend the World Cup Final in Moscow on Sunday, but the boys aren’t strong enough to attend. FIFA says the boys will be honored at another soccer event in the future.
More:
Thai Soccer Player’s Dad Speaks Out About Son’s Ordeal In Cave
ST. LOUIS (CBSNews) — A St. Louis jury on Thursday awarded nearly $4.7 billion in total damages to 22 women and their families after they claimed asbestos in Johnson & Johnson talcum powder contributed to their ovarian cancer. It was the first case against the company that focused on asbestos in the powder. The jury announced the $4.14 billion award in punitive damages shortly after awarding $550 million in compensatory damages after a six-week trial in St. Louis Circuit Court. “It’s actually one of the most extraordinary amounts of money in punitive damages,” CBS News legal expert Rikki Kliemann said Friday. Johnson & Johnson called the verdict the result of an unfair process that allowed the women to sue the company in Missouri despite most of them not living in the state and said it would appeal, as it has in previous cases that found for women who sued the company. “Johnson & Johnson remains confident that its products do not contain asbestos and do not cause ovarian cancer and intends to pursue all available appellate remedies,” spokeswoman Carol Goodrich said. Mark Lanier, lead counsel for the plaintiffs, said in a statement that Johnson & Johnson had covered up evidence of asbestos in their products for more than 40 years. More: Jury Awards Record-Setting $110.5 Million To Woman With Cancer In Baby Powder Lawsuit Medical experts testified during the trial that asbestos, a known carcinogen, is intermingled with mineral talc, which is the primary ingredient in Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower products. The plaintiffs’ lawyers said asbestos fibers and talc particles were found in the ovarian tissues of many of the women. “We hope this verdict will get the attention of the J&J board and that it will lead them to better inform the medical community and the public about the connection between asbestos, talc, and ovarian cancer,” Lanier said. “The company should pull talc from the market before causing further anguish, harm, and death from a terrible disease.” During closing arguments on Wednesday, Lanier told the jurors this case was the first where jurors saw documents showing that Johnson & Johnson knew its products contained asbestos and didn’t warn consumers, The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported . The company has been sued by more than 9,000 women who claim its talcum powder contributed to their ovarian cancer. Johnson & Johnson has consistently denied that its products can be linked to the cancer. Goodrich said the verdict awarding all the women the same amount despite differences in their circumstances showed evidence in the case was overwhelmed by prejudice created when so many plaintiffs are allowed to sue the company in one lawsuit. “Every verdict against Johnson & Johnson in this court that has gone through the appeals process has been reversed and the multiple errors present in this trial were worse than those in the prior trials which have been reversed,” she said. Lawyers for the plaintiffs said punitive damage awards are limited by state law to five times the amount of compensatory damages awarded and defense lawyers probably would file a motion to reduce the award. Six of the 22 plaintiffs in the latest trial have died from ovarian cancer. Five plaintiffs were from Missouri, with others from states that include Arizona, New York, North Dakota, California, Georgia, the Carolinas and Texas. One of the plaintiffs, Gail Ingham, 73, of O’Fallon, Missouri, told The Post-Dispatch she was diagnosed with stage-3 ovarian cancer in 1985 and underwent chemotherapy treatments, surgeries and drug treatments for a year before being declared cancer free in the early 1990s. Ingham used baby powder for decades. After court let out, she told reporters, “”The money really isn’t the important part. It’s for woman to learn about what’s in Talc and get it off there. And that maybe one or more will never have to go through this, or you won’t have to put it on your babies, because that’s the important thing about it.” (© 2018 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)
View original post here:
Johnson & Johnson Ordered To Pay Nearly $4.7 Billion In Baby Powder Lawsuit
ST. LOUIS (CBSNews) — A St. Louis jury on Thursday awarded nearly $4.7 billion in total damages to 22 women and their families after they claimed asbestos in Johnson & Johnson talcum powder contributed to their ovarian cancer. It was the first case against the company that focused on asbestos in the powder. The jury announced the $4.14 billion award in punitive damages shortly after awarding $550 million in compensatory damages after a six-week trial in St. Louis Circuit Court. “It’s actually one of the most extraordinary amounts of money in punitive damages,” CBS News legal expert Rikki Kliemann said Friday. Johnson & Johnson called the verdict the result of an unfair process that allowed the women to sue the company in Missouri despite most of them not living in the state and said it would appeal, as it has in previous cases that found for women who sued the company. “Johnson & Johnson remains confident that its products do not contain asbestos and do not cause ovarian cancer and intends to pursue all available appellate remedies,” spokeswoman Carol Goodrich said. Mark Lanier, lead counsel for the plaintiffs, said in a statement that Johnson & Johnson had covered up evidence of asbestos in their products for more than 40 years. More: Jury Awards Record-Setting $110.5 Million To Woman With Cancer In Baby Powder Lawsuit Medical experts testified during the trial that asbestos, a known carcinogen, is intermingled with mineral talc, which is the primary ingredient in Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower products. The plaintiffs’ lawyers said asbestos fibers and talc particles were found in the ovarian tissues of many of the women. “We hope this verdict will get the attention of the J&J board and that it will lead them to better inform the medical community and the public about the connection between asbestos, talc, and ovarian cancer,” Lanier said. “The company should pull talc from the market before causing further anguish, harm, and death from a terrible disease.” During closing arguments on Wednesday, Lanier told the jurors this case was the first where jurors saw documents showing that Johnson & Johnson knew its products contained asbestos and didn’t warn consumers, The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported . The company has been sued by more than 9,000 women who claim its talcum powder contributed to their ovarian cancer. Johnson & Johnson has consistently denied that its products can be linked to the cancer. Goodrich said the verdict awarding all the women the same amount despite differences in their circumstances showed evidence in the case was overwhelmed by prejudice created when so many plaintiffs are allowed to sue the company in one lawsuit. “Every verdict against Johnson & Johnson in this court that has gone through the appeals process has been reversed and the multiple errors present in this trial were worse than those in the prior trials which have been reversed,” she said. Lawyers for the plaintiffs said punitive damage awards are limited by state law to five times the amount of compensatory damages awarded and defense lawyers probably would file a motion to reduce the award. Six of the 22 plaintiffs in the latest trial have died from ovarian cancer. Five plaintiffs were from Missouri, with others from states that include Arizona, New York, North Dakota, California, Georgia, the Carolinas and Texas. One of the plaintiffs, Gail Ingham, 73, of O’Fallon, Missouri, told The Post-Dispatch she was diagnosed with stage-3 ovarian cancer in 1985 and underwent chemotherapy treatments, surgeries and drug treatments for a year before being declared cancer free in the early 1990s. Ingham used baby powder for decades. After court let out, she told reporters, “”The money really isn’t the important part. It’s for woman to learn about what’s in Talc and get it off there. And that maybe one or more will never have to go through this, or you won’t have to put it on your babies, because that’s the important thing about it.” (© 2018 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)
Go here to see the original:
Johnson & Johnson Ordered To Pay Nearly $4.7 Billion In Baby Powder Lawsuit
Today (July 13), after a lengthy drought, Father pulls up with a couple new bangers. One is called “We Had a Deal,” which finds the rapper doing some …
See more here:
Father Drops Two New Songs “We Had a Deal” and “Lotto” Featuring Abra
For pioneering rapper Chali 2na, painting and music have always been intertwined — so it makes sense that he'll be doing both as the headliner of …
See the original post here:
Pioneering rapper Chali 2na to headline — in music and painting — at Salt Lake City's Urban Arts …
For pioneering rapper Chali 2na, painting and music have always been intertwined — so it makes sense that he'll be doing both as the headliner of …
View original post here:
Pioneering rapper Chali 2na to headline — in music and painting — at Salt Lake City's Urban Arts …
1 and made the band an unorthodox pop- rap -reggae-prog-screamo sensation. (There's a lot more plot exposition happening in the second track, …
View post:
The Playlist: Twenty One Pilots Jolt Awake, and 12 More New Songs